Just a thought

One would think that a lone gunman, even two or three, would have a hard time committing the horrible attack at Ft. Hood against trained soldiers. But, the federal government makes all of the military installations a "gun free zone" of sort. Outside of issued weapons, there are heavy restrictions on private or civilian weapons on a military post.

Hasan knew this when he decided to carry his weapons onto Ft. Hood. He knew he would have unarmed targets.

So my question to the anti-gunners is this:

If private ownership of firearms and firearms themselves are so dangerous, why have we not heard of massive "outbursts of violence" at gun shows?